Considerable Variability Among Transplant Nephrologists in Judging Deceased Donor Kidney Offers.

Introduction: Transplant clinicians may disagree on whether or not to accept a deceased donor kidney offer. We investigated the interobserver variability between transplant nephrologists regarding organ acceptance and whether the use of a prediction model impacted their decisions. Methods: We developed an observational online survey with 6 real-life cases of deceased donor kidneys offered to a waitlisted recipient. Per case, nephrologists were asked to estimate the risk of adverse outcome and whether they would accept the offer for this patient, or for a patient of their own choice, and how certain they felt. These questions were repeated after revealing the risk of adverse outcome, calculated by a validated prediction model. Results: Sixty Dutch nephrologists completed the survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient of their estimated risk of adverse outcome was poor (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.62). Interobserver agreement of the decision on whether or not to accept the kidney offer was also poor (Fleiss kappa 0.13, 95% CI 0.129-0.130). The acceptance rate before and after providing the outcome of the prediction model was significantly influenced in 2 of 6 cases. Acceptance rates varied considerably among transplant centers. Conclusion: In this study, the estimated risk of adverse outcome and subsequent decision to accept a suboptimal donor kidney varied greatly among transplant nephrologists. The use of a prediction model could influence this decision and may enhance nephrologists' certainty about their decision.

Kidney utilization in the Netherlands - do we optimally use our donor organs?

BACKGROUND: To ensure optimal utilization of deceased donor kidneys, it is important to understand the precise reasons why kidneys are discarded. In this study we aimed to obtain a comprehensive overview of kidney utilization and discard during the entire donation process in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we analysed kidney utilization of 3856 kidneys in the Netherlands between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. For every kidney that was not transplanted, we determined the moment of and reason for discard through a unique case-by-case assessment. RESULTS: Kidney discard according to the traditional definition (procured but not transplanted) was 7.8%. However, when kidneys that seemed medically suitable at the beginning of the donation process were also included, many more potential donor kidneys were lost and the total non-utilization was 24.4%. Subjectively presumed impaired organ quality was responsible for 34.2% of all discarded kidneys. Two-thirds of kidneys discarded due to acute kidney injury (AKI) had only AKI stage 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: The classical definition of organ discard underestimates the non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Strategies to improve kidney utilization could be a revision of the maximum allowed agonal time in donation after circulatory death, careful consideration in reporting and accepting kidneys from donors with AKI and a prospectively filled registry of detailed organ discard reasons, including the 'silent' non-utilization before procurement.

Development and external validation study combining existing models and recent data into an up-to-date prediction model for evaluating kidneys from older deceased donors for transplantation.

With a rising demand for kidney transplantation, reliable pre-transplant assessment of organ quality becomes top priority. In clinical practice, physicians are regularly in doubt whether suboptimal kidney offers from older donors should be accepted. Here, we externally validate existing prediction models in a European population of older deceased donors, and subsequently developed and externally validated an adverse outcome prediction tool. Recipients of kidney grafts from deceased donors 50 years of age and older were included from the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR) and United States organ transplant registry from 2006-2018. The predicted adverse outcome was a composite of graft failure, death or chronic kidney disease stage 4 plus within one year after transplantation, modelled using logistic regression. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in internal, temporal and external validation. Seven existing models were validated with the same cohorts. The NOTR development cohort contained 2510 patients and 823 events. The temporal validation within NOTR had 837 patients and the external validation used 31987 patients in the United States organ transplant registry. Discrimination of our full adverse outcome model was moderate in external validation (C-statistic 0.63), though somewhat better than discrimination of the seven existing prediction models (average C-statistic 0.57). The model's calibration was highly accurate. Thus, since existing adverse outcome kidney graft survival models performed poorly in a population of older deceased donors, novel models were developed and externally validated, with maximum achievable performance in a population of older deceased kidney donors. These models could assist transplant clinicians in deciding whether to accept a kidney from an older donor.

Human mesenchymal stem cells are susceptible to lysis by CD8(+) T cells and NK cells.

There is growing interest in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to improve the outcome of organ transplantation. The immunogenicity of MSCs is, however, unclear and is important for the efficacy of MSC therapy and for potential sensitization against donor antigens. We investigated the susceptibility of autologous and allogeneic MSCs for lysis by CD8(+) T-lymphocytes and NK cells in a kidney transplant setting. MSCs were derived from adipose tissue of human kidney donors and were CD90(+), CD105(+), CD166(+), and HLA class I(+). They showed differentiation ability and immunosuppressive capacity. Lysis of MSCs by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), FACS-sorted CD8(+) T cells, and NK cells was measured by europium release assay. Allogeneic MSCs were susceptible for lysis by cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells and NK cells, while autologous MSCs were lysed by NK cells only. NK cell-mediated lysis was inversely correlated with the expression of HLA class I on MSCs. Lysis of autologous MSCs was not dependent on culturing of MSCs in FBS, and MSCs in suspension as well as adherent to plastic were lysed by NK cells. Pretransplant recipient PBMCs did not lyse donor MSCs, but PBMCs isolated 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation showed increasing lysing ability. After 12 months, CD8(+) T-cell-mediated lysis of donor MSCs persisted, indicating there was no evidence for desensitization against donor MSCs. Lysis of MSCs is important to take into account when MSCs are considered for clinical application. Our results suggest that the HLA background of MSCs and timing of MSC administration are important for the efficacy of MSC therapy.

Advancement of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in solid organ transplantation (MISOT).

There is evolving interest in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in solid organ transplantation. Pre-clinical transplantation models show efficacy of MSC in prolonging graft survival and a number of clinical studies are planned or underway. At a recent meeting of the MISOT consortium (MSC In Solid Organ Transplantation) the advances of these studies were evaluated and mechanisms underlying the potential effects of MSC discussed. Continued discussion is required for definition of safety and eventually efficacy endpoints for MSC therapy in solid organ transplantation.

Diagnostic value of urinary dysmorphic erythrocytes in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, discriminating between glomerular and nonglomerular causes of hematuria is often difficult. Dysmorphic red blood cells (dRBC) in the urinary sediment are claimed to be effective, but the cutoff points in the literature vary. This follow-up study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of dRBC. METHODS: We investigated 134 hematuria patients in the departments of nephrology and urology. To diagnose the origin of hematuria, urological and/or nephrological examination was performed and the %dRBC identified by microscopy. Follow-up was performed after 3.5 years. RESULTS: The cause of hematuria was proven in 68 patients (35% glomerular; 65% nonglomerular). Patients with glomerular disease had significantly more albuminuria and dRBC than patients with nonglomerular disease, but the %dRBC ranged from 1 to 50% and no optimal cutoff could be identified. Logistic regression analysis showed that %dRBC had a predicted probability to diagnose glomerular disease of 77.9% (area under the curve, AUC, 0.85). When %dRBC was combined with other risk factors such as serum creatinine, sex, age, dipstick erythrocyte or proteinuria score and number of casts, the predictive probability increased to 90.6% (AUC 0.97). Follow-up of the included patients showed no benefit of dRBC to identify patients at risk for glomerular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic value of routinely collected urinary dRBC to diagnose glomerular disease in patients presenting with hematuria is modest. However, including dRBC with other variables, such as age and erythrocyte score on dipstick testing may increase the sensitivity, but needs to be confirmed in another, preferably larger, population.

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells induce explosive T-cell proliferation.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) inhibit the proliferation of allo-activated lymphocytes. This effect is primarily dependent on the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors by MSCs and is enhanced under inflammatory conditions. MSCs, however, also produce factors that can potentially activate resting immune cells. Full understanding of the behavior of MSCs under inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions is crucial when clinical application of MSCs is considered. Human adipose tissue-derived MSCs were cultured with nonactivated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the activation, proliferation, and function of PBMCs were examined. Seven days of coculture with autologous or allogeneic MSCs significantly increased the proliferation of PBMCs (3-fold). This effect was observed in both direct and transwell coculture systems. MSCs cocultured with PBMCs showed increased mRNA expression of the proinflammatory mediators interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, the growth factors basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor-α, and the anti-inflammatory factor indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. After removal of MSCs, PBMCs showed a spectacular further increase in proliferation, with a maximum of 25-fold after 7 days. This increase in proliferation was not seen when PBMCs were kept in the presence of MSCs. The proliferating fraction of PBMCs largely consisted of CD4(+) T-cells with high CD25 expression and the proportion of CD127(neg)FoxP3(+) regulatory T-cells significantly increased from 5.0% to 8.5% of total CD4(+) T-cells. The expanded T-cells demonstrated normal responses to mitogen or alloantigen stimulation. The CD25(positive) fraction of these cells had immunosuppressive capacity. In conclusion, MSCs can stimulate the activation and proliferation of resting T-cells and generate regulatory T-cells. These findings are important when MSCs are applied in the clinic.

Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells suppress alloreactivity of kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have immunosuppressive capacities. Although their efficacy is currently studied in graft-versus-host disease, their effect on alloreactivity in solid organ transplant patients is unknown. In this study, the immunosuppressive effect of MSC on recipient anti-donor reactivity was examined before and after clinical kidney transplantation. METHODS: Anti-donor reactivity was established in pretransplant and posttransplant mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) of 14 living-kidney donor-recipient pairs. MSC from donors and third-party controls were added to the MLR in a ratio of 1:5. RESULTS: MSC were isolated from donor perirenal fat and showed multilineage differentiation potential and the capacity to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation. The immunosuppressive effect of MSC was dose dependent and mediated by cell-membrane contact and soluble factors, including interleukin-10 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase.Donor-derived MSC significantly inhibited the recipient anti-donor reactivity before and 1 month after transplantation. This effect was independent of human leukocyte antigen background of MSC. Flow cytometric analysis showed that MSC inhibited the proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subsets in pretransplant and posttransplant donor-directed MLR, whereas MSC had no effect on B- or natural killer-cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Donor MSC significantly inhibited the proliferation of alloactivated recipient T cells before and after kidney transplantation. We believe these findings should encourage MSC-based intervention in clinical organ transplantation.

Susceptibility of human mesenchymal stem cells to tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and rapamycin.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have multilineage differentiation and immunomodulatory capacities and are potentially useful for therapeutic applications, such as tissue regeneration and control of alloreactivity. MSC are present in most tissues including the transplantable organs. It is therefore unavoidable that MSC will be exposed to immunosuppressive drugs in a clinical transplantation setting. The molecular targets of these drugs are expressed in MSC, but the effect of their inhibition on MSC functioning is unknown. METHODS: MSC were isolated and expanded from heart tissue and the effects of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, the cell cycle inhibitor mycophenolic acid (MPA), and the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor on MSC survival, proliferation, differentiation, and immunosuppressive capacity were examined. RESULTS: Short-term exposure to the immunosuppressants did not induce toxicity or apoptosis in MSC, but high-dose tacrolimus induced toxicity after 7 days. MPA and rapamycin inhibited MSC proliferation at therapeutic doses. The immunosuppressants had differential effects on the differentiation capacity of MSC. Tacrolimus reduced the expression of troponin T type 2 and desmin during cardiomyogenic differentiation of MSC, whereas MPA decreased the deposition of calcified minerals during osteogenic differentiation. Rapamycin stimulated lipid production during adipogenic differentiation. Unexpectedly, MSC had adverse effects on the immunosuppressive efficacy of tacrolimus and rapamycin. There was no such effect of MSC on the function of MPA. Preincubation of MSC with tacrolimus increased the immunosuppressive capacity of MSC. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that therapeutic concentrations of immunosuppressive drugs affect MSC function. MSC affect the efficacy of immunosuppressive medication. These findings are important for potential clinical use of MSC in combination with immunosuppressants.

Hypokalaemia and subsequent hyperkalaemia in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to study the epidemiology of hypokalaemia [serum potassium concentration (S(K)) <3.5 mmol/l] in a general hospital population, specifically focusing on how often and why patients develop subsequent hyperkalaemia (S(K) > or =5.0 mmol/l). METHODS: In a 3-month hospital-wide study we analysed factors contributing to hypokalaemia and subsequent hyperkalaemia. RESULTS: From 1178 patients in whom S(K) was measured, 140 patients (12%) with hypokalaemia were identified (S(K) 3.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l). One hundred patients (71%) had hospital-acquired hypokalaemia. Common causes of hypokalaemia included gastrointestinal losses (67%), diuretics (36%) and haematological malignancies (9%). In 104 patients (74%), hypokalaemia was multifactorial. Hypokalaemia frequently coexisted with hyponatraemia (24%) and, when measured, hypomagnesaemia (61%). Twenty-three patients (16%) developed hyperkalaemia (highest S(K) 5.7 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) following hypokalaemia. In these patients, potassium suppletion was not more common (70 vs 59%, P = 0.5), but when potassium was given, the total amount administered was significantly higher (median 350 mmol vs 180 mmol, P = 0.02). Furthermore, these patients more often received total parenteral nutrition (17 vs 4%, P = 0.02) and magnesium suppletion (30 vs 9%, P = 0.009), and more often had haematological malignancies (22 vs 6%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hypokalaemia is a multifactorial and usually hospital-acquired condition associated with hyponatraemia and hypomagnesaemia. One out of every six patients with hypokalaemia developed subsequent hyperkalaemia. Besides potassium suppletion, total parenteral nutrition (source of potassium), magnesium suppletion (may reduce kaliuresis) and haematological malignancy (may cause cell lysis) contribute to hyperkalaemia following hypokalaemia. Caution with potassium suppletion and frequent monitoring of S(K) may prevent iatrogenic hyperkalaemia.